World
toolbar
       

January 17, 2001 

A Country Torn by Warring Interests

By IAN FISHER

Related Articles
•Congo Leader Reportedly Dead After Being Shot by Bodyguard (Jan. 17, 2000)
•U.N. Peacekeeping Mission to Congo Is Revived (Dec. 15, 2000)
•Congo's War Triumphs Over Peace Accord (Sept. 18, 2000)
• Security Council Demands That Rwanda and Uganda Leave Congo (June 17, 2000)
• U.S. Ambassador to U.N. Calls for Changes in Peacekeeping (June 14, 2000)
• War Adds 1.7 Million Deaths in Eastern Congo, Study Finds (June 9, 2000)
• Issue in Depth: Africa's Diamond Wars
• International: Africa Home
• International Home

Special Report
• Armies Ravage a Rich Land, Creating Africa's 'First World War' (Feb. 6, 2000)

Slide Show
•War in Congo


NAIROBI, Kenya, Wednesday, Jan. 17 — There was a joke in Congo's capital that President Laurent Kabila would rather share the country than share power. There is perhaps too much of Congo to go around — in land, in diamonds, coffee and gold — and that is one reason for its unending strife.

In less than three years under Mr. Kabila's erratic rule, which ended on Tuesday if reports of his death are true, a nation the size of Western Europe became the battleground for what is often called Africa's First World War. 

Since August 1998, soldiers from as many as nine African nations have engaged in Congo, all fighting more for self-interest than out of any concern for the 50 million people of Congo.

In the process, the heart of Africa has become even more chaotic than it was under three decades of misrule under Mr. Kabila's predecessor, Mobutu Sese Seko. 

As many as two million people have been displaced by war, many of them as fighting intensified in recent months. Massacres are frequent, and malnutrition is chronic. Ethnic conflict has flared up.

And the war has effectively split Congo in half, with Mr. Kabila and his allies controlling the west and south, and the rebels and their allies controlling the north and east. Many experts believe that Congo is fragmenting further into violent spheres of interest governed by whatever leaders have the firepower to stay on top.

"The east of the country has already been transformed into a patchwork of warlords' fiefdoms," reads a report last month by the International Crisis Group, a research and advocacy organization. "The territorial integrity of the Congo is threatened, as will be the stability of its nine neighbors if the chaos continues." 

For a century and a half, the outside world's image of Africa has been shaped in many ways by Congo. David Livingstone tried to convert it. Henry Morton Stanley explored it. It inspired classics like "Heart of Darkness" by Joseph Conrad and "A Bend in the River" by V. S. Naipaul. Outrage against excesses of the rubber trade under the rule of King Leopold II of Belgium sparked one of the first modern human rights crusades. 

Mr. Mobutu hoped to return to a genuinely African rule. But in the end, his tenure underscored how many in the first generation of African leaders failed to improve on the shabby opportunism of the European colonists who relinquished power in the 1950's and 1960's. 

The trade in diamonds, copper and uranium made him one of the world's richest men. He built a runway in his home village of Gbadolite that was long enough for the Concorde to land, something that happened at least twice, with special charter flights.

But his excess was only part of the reason why Laurent Kabila, a former guerrilla fighter and nightclub owner, made his way to power in May 1997 (only months before Mr. Mobutu died exiled in Morocco). The larger part of Mr. Kabila's rise lay in the complicated politics of the region and in particular the problems of Congo's tiny neighbor to the east, Rwanda.

In 1994, militant Hutus carried out a genocide of at least 500,000 Tutsis in Rwanda and after that perhaps one million Hutus fled to the eastern part of the country, then known as Zaire, as Tutsi rebels took control of Rwanda. 

But the Hutu militias continued their attacks on Rwanda from Congo. Looking for security on its border and more pliant leadership in Zaire, Rwanda secretly backed a rebellion of disaffected Tutsi officers in Mr. Mobutu's army, with the help of Uganda and Angola.

Mr. Kabila became the leader of the rebellion, and was welcomed jubilantly as the rebels raced across the nation and captured Kinshasa. 

He changed the nation's name back to Congo, from Zaire, and promised free elections and democracy.

But Mr. Kabila seemed to realize that he could not rule Congo as a tool of Rwanda and Uganda, and old allies became enemies. Rwanda accused him of supporting the Hutu militiamen, and in August 1998, again with Uganda's help, Rwanda backed a second rebellion, this time to topple Mr. Kabila.

The second rebellion might have succeeded quickly, but Mr. Kabila was rescued by soldiers from Angola, Zimbabwe, Namibia and, for a short time, Chad. 

Each nation had its own reasons for helping Mr. Kabila. Some were strategic but they also included a desire to gain a piece of Congo's diamonds, oil or fertile farmland. Uganda and Rwanda have now taken their share of diamonds, gold, timber and coffee. 

In addition, Sudan has been accused of supplying planes for Mr. Kabila's bombing runs, and Burundi has admitted to sending troops to Congo to battle rebels of its own who have bases there.

As the war progressed — mostly into a stalemate — the complexities multiplied geometrically. 

The original rebel group, the Congolese Rally for Democracy, split in two, with Rwanda backing one side and Uganda the other. Then Rwanda and Uganda came to blows inside Congo, most recently last summer in a barrage of shelling that killed at last 600 people in the city of Kisangani; most were civilians. 

A third rebel group, backed by Uganda, sprouted in Mr. Mobutu's old home, Gbadolite. And throughout it all, an ethnic war in eastern Congo, largely against Congolese Tutsis, has boiled on. 

In the summer of 1999, all parties to the conflict signed a peace accord in Zambia. It called for a cease-fire, and eventually the placement of some 5,500 peacekeepers from the United Nations. But all sides have continued to fight, and the United Nations has so far sent only several hundred observers to Congo.

Still, all sides maintain publicly that the Zambia agreement was the only way forward. 

But, as the International Crisis Group's report noted, the accord has proved "hollow."

"They all need to recoup something for the investment of blood and treasure they so foolishly squandered in Congo," it said.

E-mail this article Print this article