6 Oct 2004
306, Africa Peoples & Cultures
Colonization & Culture: Nubia
- SOUTH of 1st unnavigable point on Nile (1st cataract) called
Cush/Kush by Egyptians; we generally call it "Nubia"
(but some now use "Kush" only for later kingdoms like Napata, Meroe)
- Egypt & Nubia had complex & changing relationship, including
Cold War, outright conflict, trade, cultural influence,
intermarrying
- by 2900 BC, late Lower Nubian culture was complex stratified society, w/elite benefitting from lively trade w/Egyptian elite (example of Nubian nobility bringing gifts,
albeit from later time)
- intermarriage of elites shown in records & art
- e.g. statue of clearly Nubian woman, wife of a prince f/court at Memphis, 2650 BC
- history of intermarriage even though conflict (cf. Europe, House of Windsor; German roots; Victoria married Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha)
Early Nubian city Kerma, empire 2400-1200 BC
- between 2900-1500 BC, territorial struggle, cultural
exchange
- by 1500, competition intensified; Egypt expels Nubia from buffer zone; builds fortresses to intimidate; raids Nubia
- but also trade w/them (seen in paintings)
By 1460, Egypt overcame & colonized Kush; Lower & Upper Nubia
- ruled by Egyptian viceroy
- Egyptians move in, build estates & temples
- f/perspective of macro-level political economy, it was a
colonial domian, comparable to Eurpoean colonization:
- monopoly on force, extract wealth
- but re:peoples & cultures, different f/European colonization
- "But the majority of the population remained
Nubian and, rather than becoming an exploited or enslaved class,
participated substantially in this newly developed colonial
society. For Egyptians, color was not a bar to integration or
advancement, but cultural and linguistic differences were. The
Nubians largely assimilated Egyptian culture and, to a
substantial degree, prospered...Nubian political leadership
survived, for the Egyptians allowed Nubians to be ruled by their
own "princes"...these princes were considered part of the
Egyptian bureaucracy. They lived and were buried in Ehyptian
style. Yet they had Nubian as well as Egyptian names, probably
spoke a different language, and wore regalia reflecting their
Nubian heritage. David O'Connor (1993:14) Chiefs or Kings?
Rethinking Early Nubian Politics. Expedition 35(2):4-
14
- Important because
- challenges our notion of what happens to cultures when colonized; Egypt was extracting wealth (like 20th cent European colonizers) but also incorporating Nubians into their culture and even power
structure (unlike most Europeans; were the French an exception?)
- race wasn't ultimately defining characteristic; that developed (acc. to Davidson's argument) as result of Atlantic slave trade
- 900 BC, rise of cities in Napata area at big bend in Nile,
4th cataract
- tables turned: by 750 BC Nubia partly conquered Egypt, fully
conquered in 712 BC
- both kingdoms ruled by Nubian pharoahs; the Agypto-Nubian
kingdom was largest ever until recent times
Napata superceded by Meroe, which flourished 300BC-350AD.
- literate civ but we can't read it very well; own alphabet
independent of Phoenician-Greek; more efficient than Egyptian
- used to write the indig Nubian language, probably Nilo-Saharan
- Meroe has enigmatic aspects; e.g. famous site of Musawwarat,
w/Great Enclosure full of unroofed areas & sloping ramps
Leni Riefenstah on Nubia |