Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 24, 267-289. DOI 10.1080/02702710390227228
This paper has been published in Reading Psychology, the only definitive repository of the content that has been certified and accepted after peer review. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by Taylor & Francis. This material may not be copied or reposted without explicit permission.
An overview of the goals of English orthography counters the misconception that its spelling is chaotic and unprincipled. Direct representation of the speaker's phonemes is not its only goal. But even the sound-to-letter correspondences are not as inconsistent as widely believed. A survey of first-grade text vocabulary shows that spelling consistency is increased significantly if one takes into account the position of the phoneme within the syllable and the identity of the phonemes in the environment. Environmental influences within the rime are especially important. Understanding these patterns may reduce the complexity of spelling for learners and those with spelling problems.
The official published version of this paper may be available online via DOI 10.1017/S0142716404001195; or try Taylor & Francis Online Journals. There may be a fee for access.
A prepublication version is available here in manuscript submission format in the following file formats: