Class Times: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10-11.30 am
Location: Dunker 101
E-reserves site for this course: http://eres.wustl.edu/eres/coursepass.aspx?cid=2431
Course Website: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~grussell/Phil301.html

Instructor: Gillian Russell
Office hours: Thursdays 3-4pm or by appointment
My office: 209 Wilson Hall
Email: grussell - at - wustl - dot - edu

Teaching Assistant: Don Goodman-Wilson
Office Hours: Tuesdays 2pm
Don's office: downstairs in Wilson Hall
(go right at the bottom of the stairs and continue along to
the double doors at the end of the corridor)
Email: degoodma AT artsci DOT wustl DOT edu


This course continues on where Phil 100: An introduction to Logic and Criticial Analysis leaves off. It is recommended for students who have already taken that introductory course, and for students who already have a strong background in mathematics.

In the first half of the course we will be studying some features of truth-functional and first-order classical logics, and in particular we'll investigate the model theory for first-order logic in much greater depth than in Phil 100. After spring break, we'll go on to study four different styles of proof: tableaux, axiomatic , natural deduction and sequent calculus. If there is time, we may also take a look at free logic but this will be our only excursion into heretical (i.e. non-classical) logic.


Books

The textbook for this course is David Bostock's Intermediate Logic, published by Oxford (Clarendon).

From time to time I might assign, or suggest, some additional background reading, and this will be made available on e-res.


Readings , Topics and Homework Assignments

Homework exercises listed by a Thursday class will be due the following Tuesday at 3.30pm (the office closes at 4pm and we try to discourage students from knocking on the door at 4.01pm when the staff are leaving to go home.) They may be turned in by placing them in the appropriate file in the "turn in" cabinet in the philosophy department office on the ground floor of Wilson Hall.

Tuesday 15th January - Introduction

Truth-functions and truth-functors.
Reading: Pages 3-24 of Bostock.

Thursday 17th January

Semantics for truth-functional languages.
Reading: Pages 24-30 of Bostock.
Exercises (1): 2.1.1, 2.2.1, 2.3.1, 2.4.1(a), (c), (e), (g), (i), 2.4.2.

Tuesday 22nd January

Principles of entailment (thinning, cut, etc.)
Reading: Pages 30-37 of Bostock.

Thursday 24th January

Normal forms (DNF, PNF, etc.)
Pages 37-45 of Bostock.
Exercises (2): 2.5.1, 2.5.3, 2.6.1

Tuesday 29th January

Expressive adequacey. Pages 45-48.

Thursday 31st January

Mathematical Induction.
Reading: Pages 48-56 of Bostock.
Exercises (3): 2.7.1, 2.8.1 , 2.8.2, 2.8.3.

Tuesday 5th February

Expressive adequacey II.
Reading: Pages 56-62 of Bostock.

Thursday 7th February

Duality and truth-value analysis.
Reading: Pages 62-69 of Bostock.
Exercises (4): 2.9.1, 2.9.2, 2.10.1, 2.11.1

Tuesday 12th February

The language of first order logic.
Reading: Pages 70-81 of Bostock.

Thursday 14th February

Model theory for first order logic.
Reading: Pages 81-96 of Bostock.
Exercises (5): 3.3.1, 3.3.4, 3.4.2, 3.5.1 (now due Tuesday 26th February)

Tuesday 19th February

Some principles of entailment.
Reading: Pages 96-108 of Bostock.

Thursday 21st February

Prenex normal form.
Reading: Pages 109-115 of Bostock.
Exercises(6): 3.6.3, 3.7.1, 3.7.2 (now due Tuesday 4th March)

Tuesday 26th February

 

Thursday 28th February

 

Tuesday 4th March

 

Thursday 6th March

MIDTERM EXAMINATION (IN CLASS)

Tuesday 11th March

Spring Break

Thursday 13th March

Spring Break

Tuesday 18th March

Decision procedures for monadic predicates. Pages 115-126 of Bostock.

Thursday 20th March

More decision procedures. Pages 126-131 of Bostock.
Proofs and Counterexamples. Pages 131-138 of Bostock.

Tuesday 25th March

Semantic tableaux I - proofs.
Reading: Pages 141-165 of Bostock.

Thursday 27th March

Semantic tableaux II - Soundness and Completeness.
Readings: pages 164 - 189 of Bostock.
Homework exercises (7): 4.1.2, 4.2.1, 4.4.1 (a), (e) and (k) and 4.4.2(a), (b) and (c)

Tuesday 1st April

Axtiomatic proofs I - proofs and the deduction theorem.
Reading: Pages 190 - 208 of Bostock.

Thursday 3rd April

Axiomatic proofs II - Laws of negation. Truth-functional completeness.
Reading: Pages 208 - 220 of Bostock.
Exercises (8): 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.4.1, 5.5.1.

Tuesday 8th April

Axiomatic proofs III - Axioms for the quantifiers. Alternative axiomatisations.
Reading: Pages 220 - 238 of Bostock.

Thursday 10th April

Natural deduction I - rules for the truth-functors.
Reading: Pages 239 - 254 of Bostock.
Exercises (9): 5.6.1, 5.7.1, 6.1.1, 6.2.1

Tuesday 15th April

Natural deduction II - rules for the quantifiers. Alternative proof styles.
Reading: Pages 254 -272.

Thursday 17th April

No Class.
No extra reading.
No exercises.

Tuesday 22nd April

Catch up class (in case any of these topics take more time than planned.)

Thursday 24th April

FINAL EXAM (IN CLASS)


Assessment

50% of the grade for this course will come from the 10 sets of homework exercises completed during the semester. 25% will come from the midterm exam on 6th March (the Thursday before spring break), and 25% from the final exam, which will be during the last class of the semester.



Academic Integrity

It is very important that you understand the rules for collaboration on this course. You may work with other students in order to work out solutions to the exercises in your take-home problem sets; in fact, this is encouraged. However, each student must write up his or her solutions to the exercises alone. You may not do it with another student looking over your shoulder to correct you. You may not write your homework from notes which another student has made, nor may you make notes on another student's written solutions. You may not lend or copy digital or paper homework solutions - at any stage of completion.

Collaboration is, of course, completely forbidden during the midterm and final examinations.

Sometimes it is unclear whether a hypothetical case of collaboration is permissible according to these rules, or whether it counts as misconduct, but it is your duty to ensure that ALL your collaborations are clearly permissible. One good way to do this is not to write anything down on paper whilst investigating problems with other students: use a chalk board or white board to work out ideas, (or, if you use paper, dispose of the written solutions before you separate to write up your individual homeworks alone.)

Students suspected of plagiarism or any other form of academic dishonesty or misconduct will be reported to the academic integrity officer for Arts and Sciences (currently Dean Killen), so that the incident may be handled in a consistent, fair manner, and so that substantiated charges of misconduct may be noted in students' records.


Pass/Fail Option

For students taking the course pass/fail, the minimum letter grade required for a pass will be a D, which can be obtained with an overall percentage grade of 50%.